In reading about animal and plant classification systems, I've noticed that the latest trends favor biological ancestry over contemporary morphology. In other words, the classifications don't make as much intuitive sense because they are no longer based upon (superficial?) physical similarities -- i.e. physical similarities noticeable with our naked eyes.
I hope to add some examples of plants (rosids) and animals (ungulates) when I get a chance.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
To Our Children's Children's Children Once More
This is my occasional confession of my true view of our world and what we might do to steer our ship in a better direction. I'm sendi...
-
Why I'm a Putin Apologist Introduction I recently declared myself a "Putin apologist" in a heated debate with a friend on th...
-
Because I'm having formatting issues with Blogger, please see this post in Google Docs: Ukraine Timeline
-
Prediction: The year 2000 will some day soon be considered the acme of unfettered capitalism. The Bush legacy will be clear -- his adminis...
No comments:
Post a Comment